International Laws National Security Civil Studies By Najeh Benlahmadi Zion

International Laws , National Security & Civil Studies Aug 24 ، Aug 17 & Aug 15 2021

By Najeh Benlahmadi Zion

Ph 21693300371         USSS# 333-98-6973

.

.

Aug 24             Part A

Because I am a Law Abiding Citizen

The Diplomatic value of Right to Life and Amendment Right to Life.

The study isn't about torture itself.

It is a debate over Diplomatic Value of the Right to Life as the most important element of any Constitution, Pact or Treaties.

After establishing the fact that life is the only entity of consistent value I highlighted :

The contradictions and inconsistencies found comparing the purpose of most constitutions and Diplomacy practices.

The unpredicted results of Diplomacy Validity Boundaries.

My records and analysis of ( Criminal and Military Courts cases in few different countries) show that " Exchanging, leaking or handing the identity of a govt official or Private Info or Datas of an institution to a foreign nation without the person and govt authorization" is a consitutional violation, a violation of Protocl, Legal Process and govt policies in combatting crimes, terrorism and or social disasters.

Such violation can constitute a national security threat as well as economically, socially and religiously. It cld rise to a Terror Act, Espionage and Treason as defined by all Laws.

Under the same Laws and based on my three decades records , I found that most governments as Tunisia's still doesn't see that handing (  Private Datas of thousands of its nationals to foreign nations as in the cases of deportation) as a violation, a national and people security threat despite the fact that the procedure lacked any :

Legal representation for a group that can include a government official.

Promise to take responsibility in case the group security is threatened, which can include a government official.

Obligation to compensate the group for any harm that might be caused by the procedure.

* Sadly, It is obvious that a many lives or a group has no value Diplomatically unless I incert a government official, connection or an office*.

Such violation threat or flaw doesn't concern the nations to which immigrants or refugees belong to only but also the foreign deporting nations.

In particular the fact such deporting nations are " irresponsibly carelessly" handing "new " Datas " as testimonies" without Consent nor Legal Counseling especially testimonies exposing a government which the victim might disowned for certain practices.

* For certain reasons governments are still too blind to notice that certain four decades policies and treaties are ineffective, haven't ended migration nor solved economic problems and poverty in third world nations as Tunisia.

Clearly Tunisia's foreign affairs "Competencies" and  Diplomacy geniuses have no problem in keeping violating Innocents even if notified*.

Logically : Violation of hundreds of thousands of citizens Rights is a national security threat without [ buts]. It isn't mush different than handing Tunisia Population Digital Datas Center to an enemy. At least there is a chance the enemy won't be as ignorant. 

It is out of honesty and decency to admit that there is a disastrous difference between " Complying with constitutional laws " and " Diplomacy Codes" that exposes a gap between " Governing system validity and dictators goals" and the " Consitutional rights and best interest of the people".

* I truely believe that Liberties and Rights are and shld be private properties. One must seek any mean necessary and call for any help to defend. And I do mean any mean and any help*.

As a private property, it includes identity and related Datas. I also believe noone shld be allowed to access another's Datas without a legal authorization and in a place and time where no other than anthorized individual can access such property.

Under my definition and concept, rationally : Any violation of Civil Liberty or Right is an illegal confiscation of somebody private property which I believe it rises to Deprivation of Life.

I proved that many international treaties evolved unpredictably savage to Political Codes that dictate a near_sacred_concept of national security after it alienated and stripped the people " as a group and individuals" out of the same Law_codes of Liberties and Rights to the level it "overwhelmed" and limited the amendment Right to Life turning such law to a Coded_Legal_Inactive_Text if not " sterile" to a point where " tortured corps" in government office, Negligence, Recklessness and an Act of Torture ,as defined by Law and International Treaties definitions, became some simple violations justifiable diplomatically and " syndicately".

At this point I do mean Diplomacy as commonly known in law and whatever ( Validity, jurisdiction and immunity) package that comes with it as well as the famous Immunity practiced in third world nations as the " Diplomacy " of Evading Prosecution and Impunity either through Abusing Office or Personal " Connection".

Under most Laws, UNHR and Geneva's CAT I proved that there is no needs for Liberties and Rights *without * the respect and preservation of the Right to Life intact and without any stipulations.

I beleive any civilized citizen needs and must have Right to Abondaned Citizenship and Disowned nation of birth in certain cases.

I also believe Developed Nations must be committed to serve justice indiscriminately.

Diplomacy was created to represent constitutions , as protectors of civilians, yet I sadly found it  the most dangerous threat to Life and Right to Life and the reason behind most Human Rights violations which exposed it as Political Product that can be very catastrophic.

To understand my memoire in Laws and International Treaties a bit more I layed these questions :

How many families in a nation like Tunisia ll be threatened in thirty years under the banner of Coded Law and ignorant leaders?.

How mush Datas and Legal Testimonies ll be handed by Developed Nations to Nations of dictators and ignorants leaders?.

Can Datas be profiled and used in wars and Cold Domination?.

For more info see my research :

Profiling.

ViroDiplomacy, Torture and Terrorism.

Najeh Benlahmadi Naoui.

.

.

.

Aug 17         Part B

Because I am a Law Abiding Citizen

Justice is of ideal absolute independent universal nature, codeless and it isn't a system.

To keep up with society changes modern state tried bending Justice by constructing few codes instead a set of stipulations appeared known today as Justice System.

As a system, it is bias, serves a particular group and alienates another as found in ( Immigrants and Nationals constitutional rights).

Democracy as people decision is majority decision.

Majority decision is in fact the view of one person or the suggestion of one person agreed upon and approved by majority....

Approved by majority but still it is a " form of monocracy" which means " authoritarianism " is inevitable.

Without exception, Justice System failed in :

Insuring the trustworthiness, truthfulness, neutrality, allegiance of the majority ( parliament and voters ).

Protecting democracy from ignorance.

The reason why I believe the only way to save the maximum numbers of liberties and ethics ( without affecting the balance of morals and liberties within society ) is to bind democracy to abide by ( the safest, most efficient, most economical suggestion)_logic_concept.

Because and unfortunately modern state won't accept binding democracy and Justice plus the fact that modern state and goals are in conflict with the purpose of Justice.

 

Najeh Benlahmadi Naoui.

.

.

.

Aug 15              Part C

Because I am a Law Abiding Citizen

Prior Allegiance 

The subject isn't conflict of interest  by legal definition related.

An important part reveals ( direct, indirect, of consciousness or of unconsciousness ) signature and influence level of Prior Allegiance on ( exposure to _ selection of_construction of ) convictions which ll be used to ( select_ analyse_understand ) information since childhood, through education and graduation until construction of the personality that wld join society and or government institutions.

Though it includes groups labeled legal, peaceful and public yet I defined Prior Allegiance : any ( inclination, being influenced by , exposure to)  or any ( verbal, intellectual or physical ) declaration of ( affiliation with, descrimiation against, alienation of, being bias agianst, association with, nostalgia or support ) of a group or order labeled secretive, underground, radical or banned socially, legally or religiously.

My records show that each one out of ninety eight percent of a society had an   allegiance to a group at certain age opening my studies about how mush can it influence government institutions transactions and in particular Executive Authority and Judicial's then the press.

In the beginning an almost_conflict_of_interests like issue appeared then Obstruction of Justice and in cases its influence rises to the level of War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, Ethnicity related crimes and even coup-like as defined in treason by most laws.

Socially speaking allegiance is known to be some type of affiliation  with consequences but its impacts on liberties and Free Will , due to its " systematic alienating isolating limiting arranging " of choices nature, are all still a secret.

Logically and despite the diversity of convictions majority in this case share two common points :

First, capable to be complecently bias and that mean possibility to cover up injustice and corruption for the " required" reasons.

Second, perception of ( truth, consciousness, credibility ) and of the Allegiance concept to nation and people.

Based on my theory it is impossible to avoid irresponsible and proven inefficient ( suggestions, practices, decisions and strategies) nor systemizing such methods : which means its impossible to avoid corrupting Executive Authority, offices, Department of Defense and Law Enforcements agencies.

I believe soon or later it ll "infect" Judicial Authority and probably Legislative's some day especially if I added Impacts_Of_Genetics_Government_Bureaus_Addiction in to the equation.

The phenomenon debates :

The level of credibility, responsibility, fairness and the ability of ninety percent of government offices to " remain neutral".

The level of awareness of the concepts of principles, human responsibility and job duties.

Plus it puts the fairness of seventy percent of court trials, evidence validity and legal process under the scope exposing :

A very inhumane embarrassing reality lived and still endured by ninety percent of prisoners.

The insulting truth of Tunisia Justice System.

The future of Justice, liberties, Rights, Economy and society in Tunisia.

My theory proved that this reality threaten a nation security more than any enemy especially when I exposed the results of some of Tunisia International Treaties as in particular the ( Private_Datas_Trade_And_Access) issue internationally and nationally.

It explanied the failure of many governments attempts to end crimes, radicalism, terrorism, human rights abuse and poverty nationally and internationally.

 

 Najeh Benlahmadi Naoui.