Social, UN Human Rights & Civil Studies by Najeh Benlahmadi Zion

 

Social , UN Human Rights & Civil Studies 

Posted July 31 2021

By Najeh Benlahmadi Zion

Ph 21693300371      USSS# 333-98-6973

.

.

.

July 31

Because I am a Law Abiding Citizen

Hypothetically in Tunisia :

(((   If Tunisia president publicly offered immunity from prosecution to four hundreds and sixty persons accused of embezzlement, tax evasion or corruption.

If president did have evidence proving these accusations.

If Tunisia president as after revolution parties and governments claimed commitment to law and order and that Tunisia is a nation of institutions and order. 

If there are only five percent of government employees actually know Constitutional Rights, Civil Rights, Liberties, Human Rights and Geneva's CAT.

If there are only one percent of Tunisia people who memorized the Quran and actually know first ten Constitutional Laws, Constitutional Rights, Liberties, Human Rights, definition of Torture and Ill-treatment.

If Tunisia people praised Bourguiba for three decades, Benali for two decades, after revolution parties for a decade and today praising Kais Said.   )))

Under this hypothesis and as reminder only hypothetically speaking :

Clearly Kais Said is aware when publicly laid an offer for criminals" no body actually knows what these criminals did or financed behind doors" freedom for five billions and is aware that four hundreds criminals are bigger number than two hundreds representatives accused of corruption.

As a man of laws , I assume Kais Said is aware of Money Laundering definition and policies and the fact that there are countries offering safe haven to tax evaders, gangs, mafias and terrorists for certain benefits.

Clearly Tunisia laws geniuses, govt's revolutionaries and after revolution parties took loans and tried in fact still taking loans and trying to fix Tunisia corrupted system and make progress using " five percent " of its employees.

"I find this fact very disturbing". Clearly these geniuses are either delusional or deceiving the public.

" I believe in both cases it is a misuse of public funds".

Clearly Tunisia people claimed to be suffering from poverty, corruption, injustice, human rights violations, negligence, abuse and the embarrassing nihilism in Tunisia Institutions and also clearly these catastrophies are related to those percentages and governments awareness of such five and one percentages.

Clearly if Bourguiba or Benali or after revolution parties or its governments tried to teach the people one Constitutional Right, one Human Right, one text of Geneva's CAT and one Quran text each year , these icons wld have accomplished the Impossible within ten years.

Considering current economic failure and resources, I believe that is one of the least shld and cld have been done decisions.

"I believe It wld have ended many catastrophies including poverty".

Clearly Tunisia people either too blind to see or actually ignoring the fact that society was destroyed religiously and liberty wise and intentionally was set up to remain so.

Clearly Kais Said claims to be a man of laws and committed to Tunisia law except laws that protect Human Rights or forbid Torture, Abuse, Negligence and Discrimination.

" Noting a pattern : Bourguiba, Benali, after revolution parties and governments tried to push Liberties, Civil Rights and even Equality but limited Human Rights which I do find very contradicting and disturbing".

" Such pattern questions these leaders credibility and intent".

Sadly the fact that Tunisia reformers attempt to rescue the country without " educating the ninety five percent" indiscriminately also questions these leaders credibility and commitment. Especially when laws makers haven't thought of legislating that for ten years and I emphasize on ten years.

" I also find that very disturbing".

The embarrassing part is : I believe the percentages are much less than five and one percent.

Personally, I believe its impossible to rescue a country or society using constitutional or Human Rights and Liberty illiterate institutions.

Most important of all, it ll be delusional to think : An institution that doesn't abide nor cherich human rights can respect its national laws.

Najeh Benlahmadi Naoui.

.

.

.

July 31 

Because I am a Law Abiding Citizen

" Noting a pattern : Bourguiba, Benali, after revolution parties and governments tried to push Liberties, Civil Rights and even Equality but LIMITED if not RESTRICTED Human Rights which I do find very contradicting and disturbing".

" Such pattern questions these leaders credibility, commitment and intent".

Personally, I believe its impossible to rescue a country or society using constitutional or Human Rights and Liberty illiterate institutions.

.

In particular, Bourguiba might looks like a pro-equality liberties pioneer but that is not consistent with Bourguiba's stand and History of Human Rights.

.

Giving certain equality codes instead of Human Rights was a very very bad deal for the people.

Najeh Benlahmadi Naoui.